This question is good because it allows the reader to think more intently about the question, due to its emotional nature. The question is succinct and direct, asking for an open ended answer and allowing for the reader to be thorough. I like this question because it is not answered with merely just research but with personal experiences as well. The question is posed to gain knowledge on the subject of internet dating or possibly to start up a negotiation on how real life dating will change. This question can be posed to anyone who is old enough to have started in the dating scene and/or people who have started using online dating services. Another way to form this question is to ask specifically how it will change personal relations that do not involve the internet for finding that 'significant other.' This question will take lots of research to ultimately prove the emotional change that internet dating has caused on the general populace.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Wow. I feel like this question is huge. Are you going to focus on the limitations to monitoring infringement, punishments, methods of committing copyright 'crimes,' past incident cases, or all these sub topics and more? I'm curious to see your research. This subject is getting bigger and bigger lately, and your question is vital. I'm interested to see what experimental method you'll apply to study it. I mean it would be pretty risky to attempt copyright infringement yourself--maybe interview a past victim of the crime? You could research relevant laws, and compare past cases to your study as well.

A key word in your question is "change." Will you be comparing pre-internet copyright laws to current cases? I would suggest discussing the impact of laws enforced since the internet, even if you don't take up a comparison. Also, I think it'd be crucial to note the new definitions of materials that can be protected by copyrights, and the loopholes programs like YouTube go through to avoid getting sued. I hope this feedback was helpful, and am eager to see your research!

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

I think this is a very important question to be asking. However, it is difficult to asses, in general, if the internet is doing "more harm than good," for political campaigns/candidates b/c such an assessment is rather subjective (and also very broad). It might help to define what equals harm and what equals good. There are those that would say no press is bad press. And yet, it might be argued that this sentiment is one that "harms" the nature of politics in America today. For example, a candidate might dominate the media in certain places (blogs, facebook, etc), but in all the wrong ways. The public might know everything about his or her personal life, and nothing about his or her position on important elections issues, such as the economy. To some, this is good, because it might get the candidate elected (even if they are undeserving) Others might consider this is very harmful b/c such an election might undermine the intentions of American democracy.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

This question really starts to bring about some interesting thoughts about how the internet changes social norms. However, this question is only asking for a yes or no response. It needs to be phrased to focus more on how the internet is changing this social norm. The answer that we really want to search for is how people are changing their learning styles. There can be many different approaches to finding the answer to this overall question. Is there a decrease in medicines that treat ADD and ADHD? Are there other studies that can be found that have analyzed this topic? Other possible sources could be teachers and doctors that specialize in these types of disorders.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

This is an intriguing question primarily because it differentiates the gap between generations. We no longer go on “dates,” send letters or call others like our parents did. Our generation meets on Facebook and decides whether we like someone based on the “propaganda” they post about themselves. There is no right or wrong answer; however, for someone who hasn’t been on Facebook, they might not be aware of the implications it brings for the younger generation. It seems like the question generalizes and assumes that we all know how Facebook has changed us. It’s a question for our generation alone; those who aren’t on social networks don’t know what the implications are. On a totally different point, I think the question brings so much with it. There are so many more questions that could be prompted by in initial one. Do social networks interfere with relationships? Does being in a “Facebook” relationship deter others from wanting to me you? What if Facebook was gone, what would our generation do? I think the question has a lot of potential for reading between the lines and getting deeper meaning. However, I think that more important information could be found if the question weren’t as vague. If you focused more on specific boyfriend/girlfriend relationships or just friendships, the answers would be a lot more detailed. Overall, the question would be a really fun one to research and delve deeper into.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

This topic is very interesting because I think everyone in our generation is experiencing this kind of shift. I think it is a very interesting question, and it is definitely one that you could research easily. This question is really asking what it is that we define as a relationship with a person of the opposite sex. The question is really about what makes something official, and now that the dating and the "officialness" of the relationship relies heavily on what is is or isn't online, brings technology into the picture as a major component. The fact that you can take a relationship and proclaim it to everyone on the internet or at least on Facebook takes the relationship to a new level in some cases. By letting it be public like this, there could be some issues with letting other users into what might have started out as a personal relationship. If this relationship started online, maybe it is more appropriate to be facebook official, I don't know. In terms of having your significant other being upset by other friends, pictures, and whatever else might be on a profile, it becomes a matter of privacy. It is very easy to look at a relationship before Facebook and after Facebook and see there are differences. The question is, do we like letting our boyfriends/girlfriends see our Facebook accounts, and if we would be upset if we couldn't see their profiles? It's a one way feeling in some cases.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?